Connecticut Superior Court, 1990

Evans v. Gerber Scientific, No. 378354 (Oct. 16, 1990)

Evans v. Gerber Scientific, No. 378354 (Oct. 16, 1990)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided October 16, 1990 · KOLETSKY, J.
1990 Conn. Super. Ct. 3003
Evans v. Gerber Scientific, No. 378354 (Oct. 16, 1990)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Plaintiff's objections to defendant's Revised and Amended Request to Revise are overruled as to Request to Revise #1, #3 and #4, and sustained as to Request to Revise #2.

Defendant is entitled to require plaintiff to plead each cause of action in separate counts (Practice Book 138), so that a Motion to Strike a particular count or counts can be filed. When plaintiff "incorporates", for example, Paragraph 15d, Count One into Count Two, plaintiff makes it impossible for a Motion to Strike to be directed to Count Two, if Paragraph 15 and Count One allege a valid cause of action.

Plaintiff is ordered to comply with defendant's Request to Revise, as stated above, and in 15 days.

KOLETSKY, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.