Van Buren v. Jordan, No. 045285 (Aug. 31, 1990)
Opinion of the Court
a. Whether the $30 amount is meant for current and future support, as well as past support accrued.
b. If the $30 amount is intended as current support, what specific matters required a deviation from the child support guidelines as adopted by the State of Connecticut.
c. The reason no provision was made for medical insurance for the minor child, and the payment of unreimbursed medical, dental, optical, psychiatric, orthodonture and prescriptive expenses.
A — B
The $30.00 per week amount is for past support. As for the future, the defendant shall pay the sum of $75.00 per week retroactive to August 6, 1990.
PICKETT, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.