Bacchiochi v. Town of Stafford, No. 48187 (Oct. 4, 1991)
Opinion of the Court
The Appellant argues that the time of receipt should control but offers no evidence as to when that occurred. Even if the date of receipt were used the court presumes that the postmarked notice was received within a few days of mailing. Appellant does not deny receipt of the notice.
The second reason for the Respondent, motion relates to the failure to annex a citation containing a notice of the return date and notice of requirement for filing an appearance, see Senie v. Carothers,
The Motion to Dismiss is granted. CT Page 8579
HON. ROBERT F. McWEENY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.