Buckman v. Angelides, No. 290573 (Apr. 9, 1991)
Opinion of the Court
The defendant has now filed a motion for correction and/or reconsideration. The thrust of the motion is that the Court's ruling is not consistent with its findings. I agree.
The Court stated in its next to last paragraph: "The action commenced September 27, 1989 was therefore timely." This is obviously a computational error in light of the Court's previous findings.
The action which was commenced on September 27, 1989 is obviously not timely under Connecticut General Statutes Section
Accordingly, the decision of February 29, 1991 is vacated and the motion for summary judgment is granted.
Mihalakos, J. CT Page 3123
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.