Rouillard v. Hines, No. 098207 (Jan. 4, 1991)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#101) To the defendant's motion to strike, the plaintiff has filed no written objection, has not requested to be heard in oral argument, and has filed no opposing memorandum of law as our rules of practice require. Practice Book Section 155. The court interprets such inaction as the plaintiff's tacit consent to the court's affirmative action on the motion.

The motion to strike is granted.

GAFFNEY, J. CT Page 361