Dolinar v. Town of West Hartford, No. 358241 (Aug. 27, 1991)
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff further alleges that "[d]efendant knew that its representations with regard to the position that was being offered to plaintiff at the time she was hired would be relied upon by plaintiff to resign from the position she had previously held in order to accept the position of Assistant Manager of Health Services." Plaintiff further alleges that "[d]efendant knew that plaintiff would have to accept the Director of Health position when she was first interviewed and offered the Assistant Manager position, but intentionally concealed that fact from her for fear that she would not otherwise accept the position at all." Plaintiff further alleges that "[d]efendant's representations constitute fraud in order to induce plaintiff to give up her former employment and to accept a position different from that which defendants intended to place her in ultimately."
Defendant argues in its memorandum in support of its Motion to Strike that plaintiff "pleads reliance upon representations off the plaintiff [sic] without setting forth the essential allegations that the representations upon which she relied were untrue and known to be untrue by the defendant."
Plaintiff maintains in her memorandum in opposition that count one alleges all of the elements of fraud, and therefore defendant's Motion to Strike should be denied.
In Web Press Services Corporation v. New London Motor, Inc.,
"Under our common law, a person claiming to be a victim of fraud or misrepresentation had to prove `that a false representation was made as a statement of fact, that it was untrue and was known CT Page 7054 to be untrue by the party making it; that it was made to induce the other party to act on it; and that he did so act to his injury."
Quoting Paiva v. Vanech Heights Construction Co.,
It is clear that in count one plaintiff has failed to allege facts sufficient to support a cause of action for fraud. Defendant's Motion to Strike count one is granted.
Wagner, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.