Veto v. Heubner, No. Cv89-0103421 S (Apr. 10, 1991)
Opinion of the Court
The case was claimed for the jury, but was assigned to arbitration pursuant to General Statutes 52-549U and Practice Book 546N because the claim for damages than $15,000. The arbitrator, Attorney J.W. Cannavino, decided that Judgment should enter in favor of the plaintiff in the net amount of $798.83, and his report was filed in this court and mailed to counsel and all parties of record on December 28, 1990.
Although the plaintiff filed a "Statement" with the court on January 22, 1991, urging rejection of the arbitrator's decision, she did not appeal within twenty days of December 28, 1990, pursuant to General Statutes 52-549Z(d) and Practice Book 546S, by filing a demand for a trial de novo, nor did she seek to invoke General Statutes
Judgment therefore entered for the plaintiff on that date in the amount of $798.83, plus costs as taxed by the clerk. The defendants should satisfy this judgment by paying said amount of money to plaintiff's counsel, Attorney Nancy Ramer, who will then be in a position to release any outstanding liens or escrow arrangements. So Ordered. Dated at Stamford, Connecticut this 10th day of April, 1991.
WILLIAM B. LEWIS, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.