Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Connecticut Superior Court, 1992

S.P.G. Associates v. South Street Group Partnership, (Dec. 3, 1992)

S.P.G. Associates v. South Street Group Partnership, (Dec. 3, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided December 3, 1992 · DORSEY, STATE TRIAL REFEREE
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 10879
S.P.G. Associates v. South Street Group Partnership, (Dec. 3, 1992)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The plaintiff has not yet filed a reply to the special defenses.

The motion for summary judgment was filed prior to the October 1, 1992 amendments to the Practice Book deleting requirement that pleadings be closed between parties to motion. CT Page 10880

Therefore, the court cannot act upon the motion because pleadings are not closed between parties to the motion. Practice Book 379.

The Motion for Summary Judgment is denied without prejudice.

LEONARD W. DORSEY STATE TRIAL REFEREE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.