Connor v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. Cv 0327003s (Dec. 9, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
An action brought on these grounds can only be maintained when all the other applicable insurance coverage is exhausted. The defendant could not conceivably have any grounds to withhold their consent to a settlement for the limits of the policy. The contract provision of the policy does not apply to these circumstances and the evils it is designed to prevent are not a possibility in this case. The lack of consent to a settlement for the policy limits does not prejudice the defendant and in this case is not a valid defense to the plaintiff's claims.
The Motion to Strike the Special Defense is therefore granted.
O'KEEFE, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.