Gabrielle v. Hospital of St. Raphael, No. 319517 (Apr. 20, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
The defendants assert that because the plaintiff took no action prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations, the claim is time — barred and they are entitled to summary judgment.
The applicable statute of limitations in this matter is found in C.G.S.
The function of C.G.S.
While the clerk is to automatically grant an extension of the statute of limitations, the clerk does not have the power to allow a time — barred action. The approval of the clerk, apparently required by the statute for all petitions filed, is not binding on the Court in the review of the instant claim. Here, the plaintiff in his petition requested relief which could not be granted, that is, an extension of a time period already ended. The petition is presented to the Court ex parte, and should not prejudice the defendants' ability to raise a statute of limitations defense at the trial level. No where in
The court therefore holds that in order to obtain the 90 day extension, a petition must be filed before the statute of limitations has run. The motion for summary judgment is granted.
BY THE COURT ELAINE GORDON, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.