Systems Co. of Connecticut, Inc. v. Sinsigalli, (Dec. 3, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
A motion to strike the "proper vehicle to test the legal sufficiency of a complaint or any count therein." Babych v. McRae,
In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, an agent is not personally liable to repay advances made by an employer. 5 Conn. L. Rptr. No. 11, 300 (December 30, 1991) (Susco, J.). "The rationale . . . is that the employee's undertaking is in the nature of a joint enterprise with the employer's business, and it is not assumed that the employee . . . takes all the risk." Id, citing Perma-Home Corp. v. Nigro,
The motion to strike is granted on the ground that insufficient allegations have been made by the plaintiff to establish a right to recover an advance on a commission. The plaintiff has failed to establish the existence CT Page 10874 of an agreement contrary to the general rule that an employee is not personally liable to repay advances made by an employer.
It is so ordered.
HIGGINS, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.