Mercuriano v. Mercuriano, No. Fa90 03 13 48s (May 27, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff wishes this court to order the defendant to pay a sum certain to the plaintiff.
The court indicated to counsel that one alternative the plaintiff has is to amend the return she filed and take the depreciation and carry it over to future years, since if she did take it on the '91 income tax it would not result in a refund to her.
The court does not believe any such order as requested by the plaintiff should be granted.
McGRATH, JUDGE CT Page 4907
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.