Connecticut Superior Court, 1992

Birmingham Condo. v. Birmingham Dev., No. Cv92 29 55 13 (Nov. 18, 1992)

Birmingham Condo. v. Birmingham Dev., No. Cv92 29 55 13 (Nov. 18, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided November 18, 1992 · THIM, J. CT Page 10362
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 10361
Birmingham Condo. v. Birmingham Dev., No. Cv92 29 55 13 (Nov. 18, 1992)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

RE: APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY The plaintiff, which is a condominium owners association, seeks a prejudgment remedy of attachment to secure its claim against the declarant of the condominium. The evidence shows that rain water, mud, and stones have continuously fallen down a slope along and within the easterly boundary of the condominium association's property. Since 1987, the defendant has built various retaining walls on the slope. The last retaining wall system was a keystone wall, which the defendant built in 1990-1991. The keystone wall was an inadequate solution and the erosion problem continues to exist. The cost to stabilize the slope will be approximately $490,000.00. The plaintiff has demonstrated probable cause for a claim under General Statutes47-275. Since this lawsuit was commenced within three years from the time the keystone wall was built, the lawsuit is not barred by the time provisions of General Statutes 47-277.

The application for a prejudgment remedy is granted.

THIM, JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.