Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Karzian (Dec. 4, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff contends that the award in favor of the defendant in the amount of $60,000.00 should be vacated pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat.
In opposition to this application the defendant has filed an application requesting the court to confirm the award.
It is the contention of the plaintiff that this court may undertake a de novo review of the arbitration award as the issue presented in the application to vacate is a coverage issue. Bodner v. United States Automobile Association,
On page one of the "Decision and Award" the arbitrator states as follows:
"There is no dispute that the Claimant is a covered person. The issue is whether, under the facts, he is legally entitled to recover damages. That question can only be answered by the underlying facts. . ."
CT Page 10894
Under the limitations imposed by the Bodner case, the court is of the opinion that a de novo review would be improper.
The court finds that the award conforms to the submission and is hereby confirmed in the amount of $60,000.00.
HARRY N. JACKAWAY JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.