Connecticut Superior Court, 1992

Tzepos v. City of Waterbury, No. 0109550 (Oct. 6, 1992)

Tzepos v. City of Waterbury, No. 0109550 (Oct. 6, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided October 6, 1992 · McDONALD, J.
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 9222
Tzepos v. City of Waterbury, No. 0109550 (Oct. 6, 1992)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION CT Page 9223 Here the plaintiff Barbara A. Tzepos has retained her husband, George, to represent her in a tax appeal against the City of Waterbury. George Tzepos was a member of the Corporation Counsel's office representing the City in tax appeals at the time the assessment in question was made. There is no evidence this assessment or any confidential information concerning this assessment was ever discussed by any city officials with the Corporation Counsel's office while George Tzepos was with that office.

The American Bar Association formal opinion No. 342 would in these circumstances not require the disqualification of George Tzepos under Rule 1.11 of the Rules of Professional Conduct nor do the principles of State v. Jones, 180 Conn. 443 require his disqualification.

Accordingly, the motion to disqualify is denied.

McDONALD, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.