Connecticut Superior Court, 1992

Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992)

Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided September 17, 1992 · FLYNN, J.
1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 8718
Megura v. Fredericks, No. Cv90 03 13 45s (Sep. 17, 1992)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT After pleadings have been closed, a Motion for Summary Judgment is a proper way to test the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Boucher Agency, Inc. v. Zimmer, 106 Conn. 404, 409.

Defendant's motion is granted and the clerk is ordered to enter that order unless the plaintiff moves to amend the complaint in separate counts setting forth factual allegations to respectively support the plaintiff's claims of negligent and reckless conduct on the part of the defendant by October 6, 1992.

Flynn, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.