Middlesex Hosp. v. Town of Colchester, No. Cv 91-0062445s (May 5, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
There is also before the court the defendant DIM's "Submission of Supplemental Appendix to State Defendant's Brief" and the plaintiff's objection thereto. Inasmuch as the plaintiff was permitted by the court to attach various materials to its brief, which were not part of the record, the plaintiff's objection to DIM's similar request is overruled.
This case is essentially a replay of the controversy which was before the court in Veteran's Memorial Medical Center v. City of Meriden et al., No. CV91 032 26 73 (Superior Court, Hartford J.D.; March 17, 1992; Maloney, J.). Although there are, of course, some factual differences between this case and the Veteran's Memorial case, they are not of such significance as to compel a different result. Therefore, for the reasons more fully set forth in the Veteran's Memorial case, the court finds that the decisions of the defendant DIM and the defendant Town were in error.
The appeal is sustained.
MALONEY, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.