Jucha v. D'alto, No. Cv91 0118744 S (Apr. 2, 1992)
Opinion of the Court
The defendant has filed an affidavit asserting that the parties were informed at the time it was signed that the agreement would not be effective or valid until the other shareholders signed the agreement. The plaintiff has filed an affidavit asserting that he was advised that the agreement required signatures of other shareholders only if the shareholders' agreement so required. The plaintiff then claims that the shareholders' agreement only required approval if a sale were made to someone other than a current shareholder and therefore the missing signatures are not necessary to the creation of an enforceable agreement.
Accordingly, the question of fact exists with respect to material issues and the motion for summary judgment is therefore denied.
RUSH, J. CT Page 3031
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.