Pitt Real Estate Ltd. v. Anselmo, No. Cv92 29 80 63 (May 14, 1993)
Opinion of the Court
By way of special defenses and counterclaims, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff harmed the defendant by impairing the defendant's negotiations with a bank which was attempting to foreclose on the property and by failing to disclose to the plaintiff a relationship with a person who made an unsuccessful bid to purchase the property. After considering the defendant's various legal and factual contentions, the court concludes that plaintiff has established probable cause to sustain the validity of its claim.
The motion to dissolve or modify prejudgment remedy is denied.
THIM, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.