Glassman v. Stankewich, No. Cv 93 52136 S (Apr. 15, 1993)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied for these reasons:

Summary judgment is inappropriate in this case; the plaintiff's motion does not comply with Connecticut Practice Book requirements. See Connecticut Practice Book Section 378-386.

Also, the plaintiff failed to comply with Connecticut Practice Book Section 352 which requires the filing of a motion for default for failure to appear prior to a default judgment being entered.

BY THE COURT,

William M. Shaughnessy Judge, Superior Court CT Page 3613