Connecticut Superior Court, 1993

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided May 19, 1993 · FULLER, JUDGE
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 4903
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Darling, No. Cv88 25 41 43 S (May 19, 1993)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM ON MOTION TO REPOEN JUDGMENT The motion to reopen the judgment based on alleged fraud is denied since under 49-15 a final judgment of foreclosure cannot be opened after title has vested in any encumbrancer. Bank of Stamford v. Alaimo, 31 Conn. App. 1, 8. While fraud may be grounds for collateral attack in an independent action in equity, it cannot be used to reopen the judgment after title has passed. Merry-Go-Round Enterprises, Inc. v. Molnar, 10 Conn. App. 160, 162 n.

ROBERT A. FULLER, JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.