Ensr Corp. v. Collins Development, No. Cv 90 0112454 (Apr. 19, 1993)
Opinion of the Court
On January 11, 1993, some five months after judgment entered, the plaintiff filed a "Creditor's Bill for Equitable Relief," seeking to add two shareholders of the defendant corporation, Arthur Collins and Arthur D. Emil, as defendants. The plaintiff claims that by piercing the "corporate veil" of the defendant corporation, it could prove that these two individual shareholders were personally liable for the judgment against the CT Page 3742 corporation.
Since more than four months have elapsed since judgment entered, this court is without jurisdiction to vacate or open the judgment of August 5, 1992. See General Statutes
Therefore, the objection to plaintiff's motion for equitable relief and to add two new defendants is sustained.
So Ordered.
Dated at Stamford, Connecticut, this 19th day of April, 1993.
William B. Lewis, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.