Hampton v. Morrissey, No. 099340 (Jan. 7, 1993)
Opinion of the Court
On November 24, 1992, Morrissey filed a pro-se appearance. On December 3, 1992, a hearing in damages was held before the court. Morrissey did not receive notice of this hearing. At the time of the hearing the court was informed of the sheriff's return but was not informed of the existence of the subsequent pro-se appearance. The hearing lasted approximately an hour and a half, and at its conclusion substantial damages were awarded.
On December 15, 1992, Morrissey filed a pro-se motion to reopen the judgment. On December 28, 1992, the plaintiff filed an objection. A hearing was held on the motion and objection on December 29, 1992.
The motion to reopen is technically deficient under Conn. Gen. Stat.
This lack of proper notice to an appearing party renders the hearing in damages fundamentally unfair. The judgment resulting from that hearing cannot stand regardless of the technical deficiencies in the motion to reopen. CT Page 802
The motion to reopen is granted and the objection to it is overruled.
Dated at Waterbury this 7th day of January, 1993.
JON C. BLUE Judge of the Superior Court
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.