Connecticut Superior Court, 1993

Lee v. Shainess, No. Cv 93 52593 S (Nov. 18, 1993)

Lee v. Shainess, No. Cv 93 52593 S (Nov. 18, 1993)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided November 18, 1993 · KLACZAK, J.
1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 10036
Lee v. Shainess, No. Cv 93 52593 S (Nov. 18, 1993)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE The plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Counterclaim is granted for the following reasons:

1. The counterclaim does not have a prayer for relief. Carchidi v. Roden Hiser, 209 Conn. 526, 531 (1989).

CT Page 10037

2. The defendant did not file an objection and serve memorandum of law. (C.P.B. 155), (nor did the defendant appear at the hearing).

Klaczak, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.