Connecticut Superior Court, 1994

Cosgrove v. T.D.P., Inc., No. 67382 (Feb. 16, 1994)

Cosgrove v. T.D.P., Inc., No. 67382 (Feb. 16, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided February 16, 1994 · GAFFNEY, J.
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1620
Cosgrove v. T.D.P., Inc., No. 67382 (Feb. 16, 1994)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER (#107) The defendant T.D.P. Inc.'s motion to strike having been presented, it is hereby Ordered: denied; for the following reasons:

(1) The defendant's motion does not comply with the requirements of P.B., Sec. 154, in that it does not specify the reason or reasons for the claimed insufficiency; and its accompanying memorandum of law does not serve as a substitute therefor. King v. Board of Education, 195 Conn. 90, 94 n. 4 (1985); and

(2) the statutory authority (Sec. 43-31, Conn. Gen. Stat.) on which the motion relies ("Sale of preheated petroleum products to be by weight") has no application to either the third or sixth counts of the complaint.

GAFFNEY, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.