Tesdahl v. Replacement Rent-A-Car, No. Cv93 529032 (Jan. 3, 1994)
Opinion of the Court
Defendant moves to dismiss this action against him on the basis of lack of personal jurisdiction because no valid service was made on him. Plaintiff claims the service on the Commissioner was valid as against the defendant under Conn. Gen. Statutes
Paragraph (a) of
Paragraph (b) which spells out how service on the Commissioner is to be made does not enlarge the scope of paragraph (a) merely because it fails to repeat the requirement that the accident take place in this state. Since the accident took place in Massachusetts, Conn. Gen. Statutes
Since no valid service was made on this defendant, his motion to dismiss is granted.
Wagner, J. CT Page 14
[EDITORS' NOTE: THE CASE THAT PREVIOUSLY APPEARED ON THIS PAGE HAS BEEN MOVED TO CONN. SUP. PUBLISHED OPINIONS.]
CT Page 14-e
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.