Safeco Ins. v. Ct. Concr./saw Cutting, No. Cv92 029 42 82 (Oct. 27, 1994)
Opinion of the Court
The court finds that the ATR committed plain error in recommending that judgment enter in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Felix since the plaintiff did not sue Felix.
The court finds that it also was plain error for the ATR to set aside the court's order defaulting the defendant Fiorito's Service.
The objection to the acceptance of the ATR's report, as corrected, is sustained. The case is remanded to another attorney trial referee for proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
BY THE COURT
LEVIN, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.