Lorenzetti v. Connecticut National Bank, No. Cv-93-0703911 (Apr. 19, 1994)
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment as to liability on Counts One (malicious prosecution), Three (libel) and Six (CUTPA) which are directed against Town Fair and its manager, claiming that affidavits, exhibits, and deposition testimony, filed by him, establish that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that Plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Defendants have claimed that there are numerous material issues of fact in dispute, that their special defense of "unclean hands" has not been addressed and that Plaintiff's claims of law are insufficient. Defendants have filed their own affidavits and documentary evidence in opposition to this motion.
It is unnecessary to consider all of Defendants' claims because a cursory review of the file and the briefs discloses the presence of several genuine issues of material fact.
In Count One, these are the issues of malice and probable cause for the arrest of Plaintiff by the police; in Count Three, there is the issue whether the "published material" i.e. the application for arrest was, in fact false. See Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.,
Motion for Summary Judgment denied.
WAGNER, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.