Connecticut Superior Court, 1994

Brophy v. Brophy, No. Fa 91-0447026 (Oct. 12, 1994)

Brophy v. Brophy, No. Fa 91-0447026 (Oct. 12, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided October 12, 1994 · KREMSKI, STATE TRIAL REFEREE.
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 10308
Brophy v. Brophy, No. Fa 91-0447026 (Oct. 12, 1994)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ARTICULATION CT Page 10309 The court articulates it's ruling on Defendant's Motion for Contempt dated June 28, 1994, as follows:

As to the issues or questions raised in Defendant's Motion for Articulation in,

Paragraph 1. The court' response is "Yes".

Paragraph 2. The three weeks arrearage amounts to $690.00.

Paragraph 3. That plaintiff's credit of $7,500.00 eliminated a corresponding sum of arrearage due to the defendant.

JULIUS J. KREMSKI STATE TRIAL REFEREE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.