Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Connecticut Superior Court, 1994

Hill v. Mall, No. Cv93 0309368s (Apr. 5, 1994)

Hill v. Mall, No. Cv93 0309368s (Apr. 5, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 5, 1994 · FREEDMAN, J.
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 3526
Hill v. Mall, No. Cv93 0309368s (Apr. 5, 1994)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (#101) The plaintiff asks for treble damages for theft. When construing 52-564, the court looks to 53a-119. "Steals" in52-564 is synonymous with the definition of larceny therein. Lauder v. Peck, 11 Conn. App. 161, 165.

Section 53a-119 includes "obtaining property by false pretenses with intent to defraud" and "obtaining property by false promise . . . pursuant to a scheme to defraud."

The plaintiff pled sufficient facts to come under 52-564.

The motion to strike (#101) denied.

SAMUEL S. FREEDMAN, J. CT Page 3527

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.