Connecticut Superior Court, 1994

Pinto v. Town of Enfield, No. Cv94 053 81 89 (Sep. 16, 1994)

Pinto v. Town of Enfield, No. Cv94 053 81 89 (Sep. 16, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided September 16, 1994 · ALLEN, STATE TRIAL REFEREE.
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 9192
Pinto v. Town of Enfield, No. Cv94 053 81 89 (Sep. 16, 1994)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TOFILE AMENDED COMPLAINT DATED AUGUST 10, 1994 Plaintiffs seek to file an amended complaint to add a count for loss of consortium with respect to defendant Town of Enfield. The Town objects claiming that the complaint is brought pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-149 which does not permit damages for loss of consortium. The court agrees.

"Section 13a-149 does not permit damages for loss of consortium but permits recovery only by the injured `traveler'". Sanzone v. Board of Police Commissioners,219 Conn. 179, 199. (citations omitted.) (Although the complaint refers to § 13a-144 in its allegations against the Town, the court assumes the plaintiffs meant to refer to § 13a-149.)

The defendant's objection is sustained.

Allen State Trial Referee CT Page 9193

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.