Berger v. Berger, No. Fa88 25 09 76 S (May 17, 1994)
Opinion of the Court
This court further concludes that the parties conduct clearly demonstrates that the parties intended the periodic alimony payments due under the escalation clause (paragraph 2.2 of the separation agreement) are to be paid throughout the year which follows the year defendant earned the income upon which the additional periodic alimony is based. Thus, the defendant does not owe $22,000, as claimed by the plaintiff. He is, however, $2,226.00 in arrears.
The arrearage did not arise under circumstances which would justify a finding of contempt. The defendant is ordered to pay the arrearages within sixty days.
GEORGE N. THIM, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.