Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Connecticut Superior Court, 1994

Mather v. Mather, No. Fa93 030 72 69 S (Nov. 29, 1994)

Mather v. Mather, No. Fa93 030 72 69 S (Nov. 29, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided November 29, 1994 · BASSICK, JUDGE.
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11907
Mather v. Mather, No. Fa93 030 72 69 S (Nov. 29, 1994)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION TO REARGUE (NO. 110) CT Page 11908 The Motion to Reargue dated October 14, 1994 is presented to the court pursuant to § 204B of the Practice Book as amended. Since a motion to extend time to appeal has been filed, this motion has been scheduled for hearing.

The court has reviewed the transcript of testimony submitted by defendant's counsel at the hearing on the Motion to Reargue together with defendant's exhibit 1.

Based upon the evidence produced at the hearing held on the Motion to Compel on September 30, 1994, it is clear to the court that the Motion to Compel was properly decided. The Motion to Reopen is denied.

EDGAR W. BASSICK, III, JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.