Herring v. Guida, No. Cvnh 9401-6139 (Oct. 24, 1994)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Having heard the parties through their counsel and having reviewed the parties' memoranda of law, the Court hereby denies the defendant's Motion to Strike, upon the reasons and the authorities set out in the plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to the Motion to Strike. See also Pagani v. BT IILimited Partnership, 24 Conn. App. 739 (1991).

Clarance J. Jones, Judge