Tillman v. Ginter Associates, Inc., No. Cv94 31 49 88 S (Oct. 4, 1994)
Opinion of the Court
The defendants' motion to dismiss is predicated on the assumption the one year period for filing a second action under CT Page 10310 §
The only judgment entered by the court in CV92-0292768 was a judgment dismissing the action under Practice Book § 251. The judgment was entered on December 10, 1993, which is less than one year prior to the plaintiff's filing of this second action. The court never entered a judgment of non-suit. Instead, the court ordered plaintiff to file a revised complaint by June 8, 1993. The court also ordered plaintiff to comply with another defendant's discovery request "within 2 wks or nonsuit enters." The entry of a judgment on non-suit for the plaintiff's failing to comply with these orders would have required further action by the court. Further action was never requested by the parties nor taken by the court.
The motion to dismiss is denied.
THIM, JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.