Presti v. Presti, No. Fa91-098882s (Mar. 10, 1994)
Opinion of the Court
The parties were divorced September 3, 1993. Prior to the dissolution the Town had moved for contempt as against Mr. CT Page 2471 Presti for failure to pry the support due to the Town. The motion for contempt was granted on July 13, 1992. The Town, by letter to counsel for both parties, agreed to permit the dissolution so long as the Town's position would be litigated at a later date.
The issue in this case is whether a municipality may intervene in a dissolution case to seek reimbursement for general assistance payments. That issue has already been decided. The decision of the court was that Mr. Presti must reimburse the Town for payments made. That issue is no longer in the case.
Accordingly, judgment may enter in favor of the Town in the amount of $5,050, the amount of the unreimbursed arrearage.
Hurley, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.