Connecticut Superior Court, 1994

Martin v. Veronneau, No. 106771 (Feb. 10, 1994)

Martin v. Veronneau, No. 106771 (Feb. 10, 1994)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided February 10, 1994 · McDONALD, J.
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 1438
Martin v. Veronneau, No. 106771 (Feb. 10, 1994)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant, Marcel Veronneau, has moved the court to order the plaintiffs to amend their complaint and cite in Moffo Trucking for apportionment under General Statutes 52-102 and52-572h. Under the circumstances of this case, it is proper to deny the motion to cite in made pursuant to General Statutes52-102. Bulley v. Tettlebaum, 8 CSCR 996 (October 11, 1993, Higgins, J.). If the defendant wishes to bring Moffo Trucking into the case, it may move to implead under General Statutes52-102a and Practice Book 117. See Bulley, 8 CSCR at 996.

Accordingly, the motion to cite in is denied.

/s/ McDonald, J. McDONALD

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.