State v. Michael Walsh, No. Cr4-237613 (Oct. 26, 1995)
Opinion of the Court
These two cases are factually similar and legally connected.
Evidence of prior sex offenses committed with persons other than the prosecuting witness is admissible to show a common design or plan where the prior offenses are not too remote in time; are similar to the offense charged and are committed upon persons similar to the prosecuting witness.
In these cases there is a common scheme — to abuse young girls sexually; the offenses are not remote in time and they are similar in the following respects:
The victims are young girls; the alleged abuse occurred at the defendant's home; there were threats against each victim, i.e., victim #1, the defendant would force her to go to math class and double the times she has to go into the bedroom and with victim #2, the threat of shooting her; type of sex, i.e., anal sex with victim #1 and with victim #2, the attempt to have sex with her from behind. CT Page 11864
For the above reasons, the motion to consolidate is granted.
/s/ Damiani, J. DAMIANI
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.