Connecticut Superior Court, 1995

Jennings v. Lang, No. Cv93 30 88 87 S (Apr. 10, 1995)

Jennings v. Lang, No. Cv93 30 88 87 S (Apr. 10, 1995)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided April 10, 1995 · FORD, JUDGE.
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3747; 14 Conn. L. Rptr. 101
Jennings v. Lang, No. Cv93 30 88 87 S (Apr. 10, 1995)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION TO STRIKE (#113) Despite the parental immunity doctrine, a defendant may seek an apportionment of liability from the minor plaintiff's parent. CT Page 3748 See Brozdowski v. Southern Connecticut Gas Co., 7 Conn. L. Rptr. (9/21/92, Katz, J, ); Green v. Mancusi, 9 CSCR 117 (2/7/94, Karazin, J.); Buero v. Duva, 7 CSCR 919 (7/9/02, Fuller, J.); Gurge v.Eggert, 12 Conn. L. Rptr. 222 (9/12/94, Hauser, J.). This is so because the parental immunity doctrine is only implicated where the unemancipated minor sues his parents directly for injuries allegedly caused by the parents' negligence. Dubay v. Irish,207 Conn. 518, 523, 542 A.2d 711 (1988).

FORD, JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.