Kane v. Kane, No. Fa 93 0063450 (Jul. 5, 1995)
Opinion of the Court
Second page, first full paragraph after the quote should read as follows:
It is submitted that an examination of the testimony set forth in the Appendix clearly does not demonstrate that "another, not knowing whether or not the judge is actually impartial, mightreasonably question his [or her] impartiality on the basis of all the circumstances." It is obvious from a comparison of the testimony of the two witnesses that Debra Van Keuren was present during the entire conversation and that nothing concerning the case was discussed.
PICKETT, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.