Parker v. Parker, No. Fa96-0711977s (Nov. 26, 1996)
Opinion of the Court
The Court declines to enter further orders as the temporary nature of the Court's orders have inevitably been superseded by intervening factual developments.
The Defendant's claims as to Plaintiff's distribution of severance benefits should appropriately be considered in the final financial orders. The Court will not enter further pendente lite orders based on very limited testimony and argument presented in May or June.
There is no reason why the undersigned need be further involved in this case.
Robert F. McWeeny, J.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.