Franco v. Franco, No. Fa 87 0240305 (Oct. 31, 1996)
Opinion of the Court
In that memorandum, the court denied the defendant's motion for a reduction of child support and granted the plaintiff's motion for an increase in child support.
The court has been asked by the plaintiff to clarify its memorandum by specifying the date upon which the increase is to have taken effect. The effective date of the modification increasing child support is the date of the filing of the CT Page 8696 plaintiff's motion for modification.
Since the rendition of the notice of the court's memorandum, the defendant has filed a motion for an extension of time to file his appeal. That motion was dated October 4, 1996, and was filed on or about that date.
Having considered the reasons for the relief sought in the motion and noting the time which has already passed since the filing of said motion, the court hereby denies the defendant's motion of extension of time to appeal.
BY THE COURT
Joseph W. Doherty, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.