Connecticut Superior Court, 1996

Luzetsky v. Staub, No. Cv90 27 63 06 S (Aug. 20, 1996)

Luzetsky v. Staub, No. Cv90 27 63 06 S (Aug. 20, 1996)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided August 20, 1996 · THIM, JUDGE.
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 5284-WWWWWWWW
Luzetsky v. Staub, No. Cv90 27 63 06 S (Aug. 20, 1996)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]RULING

RE: DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFFS' BILL OF COSTS The defendant, Dr. Edward M. Staub, objects to the plaintiffs' bill of costs. In particular, Dr. Staub objects to the witness fees charged by Dr. Gerald Rubacky, Dr. Daniel Davis, and Dr. Ronald Homza.

Dr. Rubacky, who specializes in orthopaedics, testified from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on November 30, 1995. He charged $6,000.00 for testifying, $400.00 for transportation to and from New York City, and $250.00 for preparation. The defendant claims the fee is excessive. The court concludes $4,650.00 is a reasonable fee for Dr. Rubacky's time in court, preparation and travel.

Dr. Homza, who specializes in physical medicine and rehabilitation, testified for one and a quarter hours. He charged $1,550.00. His fee is $750.00 for the first hour and $500.00 for each successive hour or part thereof. The court finds $1,000.00 is a reasonable fee.

Dr. Davis testified one hour. He charged $1,750.00. Dr. Davis is a podiatrist. His hourly fee is $250.00. He charged $1,750.00 on the basis he canceled his appointments for the day. The court concludes $500.00 is an appropriate fee.

THIM, JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.