Socha v. Bridgeport Hospital, No. Cv96 33 16 62 S (Nov. 19, 1996)

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]RULING RE: PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REQUEST TO REVISE FILED BYDEFENDANTS BRIDGEPORT HOSPITAL AND DOCTOR DAVID BAKER First Count:

The following objections are sustained: numbers 1-3, 6-12,14-21, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30-32, 34-44, 46, 47.

Objection 4: Delete the second sentence of paragraph twelve. The rest of the objection is sustained.

Objection 5: State who knew "Mr. Socha had a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease."

Objection 13: Delete the second sentence of paragraph 22.

Objection 22: Delete the words "was found to have."

Objection 24: Identify the defendant who employed "the agents, servants and employees" who retrieved blood.

Objection 26: Delete the sentence "This was a sign of renal failure."

Objection 29: Delete the second sentence of paragraph 38, i.e. "Motrin . . . function."

Objection 33: Delete the word "excitedly."

Objection 45 is overruled.

Third Count: CT Page 9775

Objection 1: See rulings for paragraphs 1-46.

The following objections are sustained: 1-7.

Objection 8 is overruled.

Sixth Count:

Objection 1: See rulings for paragraphs 1-49.

Objection 2: Specify any damages other than damages for loss of consortium as provided under General Statutes § 52-555b.

THIM, JUDGE