Connecticut Superior Court, 1996

Heard v. Montanez, No. Cv95 0149551 S (Oct. 8, 1996)

Heard v. Montanez, No. Cv95 0149551 S (Oct. 8, 1996)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided October 8, 1996 · RYAN, J.
1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 7817
Heard v. Montanez, No. Cv95 0149551 S (Oct. 8, 1996)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The defendant's motion to dismiss (#102) is granted. The complaint was not timely served and was not timely returned to court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 52-46 and 52-46a. "This statute is mandatory and failure to comply with its requirements as to the time when process shall be served renders the proceeding voidable and subject to abatement." Rogozinski v.American Food Service Equip. Corp., 211 Conn. 431, 433,559 A.2d 1110 (1989). Voidable means voidable at the defendant's instance.Bergin v. Bergin, 3 Conn. App. 566, 569, 490 A.2d 543 (1985). The defendant has not waived the defect. Accordingly, the motion is granted.

RYAN, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.