Bellino v. Warden, State Prison, No. 359354 (Jan. 25, 1996)
Opinion of the Court
The sole issue raised before the habeas court was whether the petitioner had effective assistance of counsel before the trial court. He alleges that his trial counsel suggested that he falsely testify that he did not shoot at the victim, even though he claims he did so in self defense. The trial attorney denied this before the habeas court, thereby reducing the issue to a question of credibility. The habeas court found the trial attorney to be credible and therefore denied the petition.
"The underlying historical facts found by the habeas court may not be disturbed unless the findings were clearly erroneous." Copas v.Commissioner of Correction,
The petition for certification is denied.
Robert I. Berdon, Justice Supreme Court of Connecticut
Dated: January 23, 1996
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.