Fleetwood v. Bridgeport Roman Cath., No. Cv95 32 36 39 S (Oct. 23, 1997)
Opinion of the Court
1. The objection by Bishop Walter Curtis, Bishop Edward M. Egan, and Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation to the production of the listed documents is overruled.
2. The objection of defendant Charles Carr to producing documents 79, 94, 100 and 106, as set forth on the list of 138 pre-suit documents filed by the Diocese, is sustained. These documents contain psychological evaluations prepared in 1990. Defendant Carr's objection to producing documents 95, 97, 98, and 99 is sustained. Defendant Carr's objection to producing the other documents is overruled.
3. The terms of the protective order issued by Judge Levin in the case of George L. Rosado, et al v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation, et al, CV93-0300272S, shall apply. A copy of the order is attached.
GEORGE N. THIM, JUDGE CT Page 10336
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.