Clark v. Robbins, No. Cv 93 0131489 S (Oct. 31, 1997)
Opinion of the Court
The court does not recall that the issue of a requirement for a surety on the process was ever addressed at the hearing and the order itself does not address it. CT Page 10966
Since these additional defendants had not requested to be joined as additional parties, the court assumed that they would be served with process in accordance with P.B Sections 49 and 52.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.