Connecticut Superior Court, 1997

Goldblum v. the Pittston Company, No. Cv92 0126252 S (Feb. 14, 1997)

Goldblum v. the Pittston Company, No. Cv92 0126252 S (Feb. 14, 1997)
Connecticut Superior Court · Decided February 14, 1997 · NADEAU, J.
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 815
Goldblum v. the Pittston Company, No. Cv92 0126252 S (Feb. 14, 1997)

Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Defendant's second Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.Doty v. Mucci, 238 Conn. 800 (1996) does not specifically override any germane holding of Judge Stevens in the first summary judgment determination herein. Additionally, the Doty plaintiffs made a concession not made here by plaintiffs; furtherDoty not only fails to determine which limitation governs (see its footnote 6), it did not determine in any way whether the "hazardous chemical substance"/"federal standard" section plaintiff holds out hope for might not be also within the forgiving parameters of § 52-577c. As to that potential, the court has earlier ruled that summary judgment cannot lie. Thus, Judge Stevens' decision ought to remain the law of the case.

NADEAU, J.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.