Judelson v. D'ostilio, No. Cv97 0403238 (Sep. 9, 1997)
Opinion of the Court
Without further allegations about the validity of the defendant's claim for a commission as a result of a written commission agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant, the plaintiff asks the court to discharge the lien since it was not served upon the plaintiff until the day before the closing in derogation of Conn. Gen. Stat. Sec.
The defendant is found to have actual notice of the pendency of this action and actual notice of this hearing requesting an immediate discharge of the lien, the sheriff's return indicating in-hand service on August 14, 1997, on the defendant of the Order to Show Cause. The defendant has not appeared to show cause why the lien should not be discharged. The court finds the issue in CT Page 9066 favor of the plaintiff and orders the lien discharged.
Patty Jenkins Pittman, Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.